Sunscreen Rules Get Overhauled in Meaningless Way After 33 Years

Posted on 14th June 2011 in Uncategorized

Trust Us. It's Safe!

 

The FDA announced that after leaping into action in 1978, it has come to a decision that sunscreen makers are saying things that are not true.  After exposing people to harm for 33 years, sunscreen makers are going to be forced to make some trivial labeling changes.  The New York Times breathlessly claims the sunscreen industry will be transformed.  In fact, sunscreen manufacturers will no longer be able to call their products “water proof” (it took 33 years to figure that out?).

The new regulations will also more clearly define the term “broad spectrum”, and limit the claim that it “prevents sunburn” to products that are SPF 15 or greater.  Big deal.  Nobody is going to read that pathetic fine print.  They are going to buy the big blue bottle that says KIDS.

Besides some of my other gripes about sunscreen, such as the toxic chemicals and that there is little or no proof that it prevents cancer, my biggest gripe is that manufacturers do not tell you how much to use (and of course the FDA doesn’t address this).  If you think you know the proper amount, you are wrong!

Here is what Wikipedia (sunscreen) has to say about how much sunscreen is used in the official tests vs. how much sunscreen you use:

The dose used in FDA sunscreen testing is 2 mg/cm² of exposed skin. Provided one assumes an “average” adult build of height 5 ft 4 in (163 cm) and weight 150 lb (68 kg) with a 32 in (82 cm) waist, that adult wearing a bathing suit covering the groin area should apply 29 g (approximately 1 oz) evenly to the uncovered body area. Considering only the face, this translates to about 1/4 to 1/3 of a teaspoon for the average adult face. Larger individuals should scale these quantities accordingly.

Contrary to the common advice that sunscreen should be reapplied every 2–3 hours, some research has shown that the best protection is achieved by application 15–30 minutes before exposure, followed by one reapplication 15–30 minutes after the sun exposure begins. Further reapplication is only necessary after activities such as swimming, sweating, or rubbing/wiping.

However, more recent research at the University of California, Riverside, indicates that sunscreen needs to be reapplied within 2 hours in order to remain effective. Not reapplying could even cause more cell damage than not using sunscreen at all, due to the release of extra free radicals from those sunscreen chemicals which were absorbed into the skin. Some studies have shown that people commonly apply only 1/2 to 1/4 of the amount recommended to achieve the rated sun protection factor (SPF), and in consequence the effective SPF should be downgraded to a square or 4th root of the advertised value.

That means you are supposed to use at least ¼ of an entire 4 oz bottle if you are going swimming.  Let me do that math for you.  To figure out the actual SPF of the sunscreen you are using, taking into consideration that you are using 1/4th the proper amount, you must take the 4th root of the stated SPF.  That means when the bottle says SPF 50, you are actually getting an SPF of 2.7 !  So unless you look like a clown covered in white makeup after you apply your sunscreen, you are getting 1/19th of the protection that you were hoping for.

I almost never use sunscreen on my kids.  On normal days, I let them get sun.  If they are going to be out for a while they wear hats with brims, long sleeved shirts, or the stretchy fabric shirts for the water.  And if that is not going to be enough protection, I apply one of the zinc or titanium oxide sun screens suggested by the Environmental Working Group (EWG) – Skin Deep – Sunscreens 2011.  And the EWG also has an iPhone app for your drug store trips.

Maybe in 33 more years, in the year 2044, the FDA will recommend that you not smear poison on your children at all!  Of course your 8 year old will be 41 by then, and will have spent her life lathered in ineffective harmful chemicals.  Thanks for protecting chemical companies rather than our children American Government!

 

comment on forum

 

Kick the Kids Out of the House

Posted on 7th June 2011 in Uncategorized
Outside All Day

Outside All Day

 

Playing outside has never been a less popular option for children.

Children are kept inside out of fear of crime more and more even though all forms of crime are at their lowest levels since the 1950s.  This is because like their children, parents watch too much TV, and in particular, too much TV news.  TV news, which makes money by scaring you into watching, turns one crime in the entire country into a first person experience for tens of millions of people, even though they might live 2000 miles from where the crime took place.  A crime that happened two time zones away seems like it happened on your street, so you lock your children in the house and put them in front of the TV.

Children are kept inside because there is a pathological fear of the sun that Dracula would find extreme.  Never mind that people spent their entire lives in the sun for 2 million years.  And never mind that the most dangerous forms of skin cancer have nothing to do with sun exposure.  And never mind that Vitamin D and sun exposure is turning out to be very important for many bodily functions including the immune system and mental health.

And it seems that in addition to making children fat, physically weak, and unable to concentrate, keeping children indoors also seems to weaken their eyes.  According to an article in LifeHacker, Spending More Time Outdoors May Help Prevent Nearsightedness. Exposure to bright sunlight regulates the growth of the eye itself, and by doing so, helps prevent the type of eye growth that causes myopia, also known as nearsightedness.

The pattern here is obvious.  The human body is built for activity, and specifically outdoor activity.  Cavemen, and pre-historic children did not sit indoors in school for 6 hours per day, and then spend another 4.5 hours per day (the national average for children) motionless in front of the TV.  They moved around outside.  So our bodies are made to do the same.

If you do not encourage your children to run and play outside in the sun, they will be less healthy and less happy.

 

comment on forum

 

Boys Need to Move – Part 1

Posted on 3rd June 2011 in Uncategorized
Run and Kick

Kids Need to Move

People evolved in a world where survival meant movement.  Our ancestors had to search for food, hunt animals, and farm the land without any manufactured equipment or even animals until recently.  If you sat in one place for 12 hours per day, week after week, you would die.

Estimates are that prehistoric people moved 5 to 15 miles per day hunting, gathering, chasing, escaping, exploring, playing and moving to more fertile grounds as the seasons changed.

Today people sit.  Every year there are more excuses for physical inactivity.  People sit at work.  They sit for entertainment or out of exhaustion in front of the TV or computer or video games. They sit going to and from work.  In other words people are not using their bodies in the ways they were meant to be used.  This is killing us and making us chronically stressed and depressed.

For children the situation is even worse.  Kids need to move more than adults do.  Their bodies and minds drive them to movement so that they will grow and develop property, both physically and mentally.  When allowed to, children run for fun! They just run and run.  Anyone who has watched a group of kids on a playground knows that this is true.

Unfortunately, kids today are not allowed to run or move.  The average child is allowed to watch between 4 and 5 hours of TV and “screen time” per day (screen time includes sitting at a computer and playing video games).  On top of that, PE classes are being cut or eliminated.  And many parents, out of fear for their safety, no longer allow children to go outside unsupervised.

And what is the result?  Fat kids.  Unhappy kids.  And kids who are increasingly being diagnosed as having Attention Deficit Disorders.  They are being held still against their will, and then they are being drugged when they try to move, or lose the ability to focus.

That is the problem.  Next time I will address some of the solutions.

 

comment on forum

 

Children Need Sleep

Posted on 28th May 2011 in Uncategorized

I am a huge proponent of children getting as much sleep as they need.  I really believe that many problems with children go back to sleep, diet, and activity (or lack of TV).

For parents with brand new babies, Happiest Baby on the Block by Harvey Karp is the greatest resource since the binky or swaddling blanket.  Get the DVD because new parents are too tired to read or think, but they can sit and stare.

Another good book is Healthy Sleep Habits, Happy Child by Marc Weissbluth.  Most parents think they don’t need to do anything to help their babies sleep, but can’t figure out why they are not sleeping through the night after 1 or 2 years!  There are techniques and totally logical approaches to getting your child to sleep like a champ, which of course allows you to sleep like a champ.

As an example, using these techniques we were able to get our son and daughter to sleep at least 6 hours straight by the time they were about 8 to 10 weeks old.  It is not an accident or luck.

And if you need another reason besides your own sanity to get your child to sleep through the night, here is a study, reported in Science Daily, that links lack of early childhood sleep to obesity:

Children who sleep less are more likely to be overweight, study finds

The results show that young children who sleep less are at a significantly increased risk of having a higher BMI by age 7, even after controlling for other risk factors that have been implicated in body weight regulation.

Each additional hour of sleep per night at age 3 to 5 years was associated with a reduction in BMI of 0.49 and a 61% reduction in the risk of being overweight or obese at age 7.

In a child of average height, this corresponds to a difference of 0.7kg body weight. While this might seem minor at an individual level, the benefits for public health, if applied at the population level, are considerable, say the authors.

Start you kids on good sleep habits early.  Don not leave it to chance.  Your family will be happier and healthier for life!

 

comment on forum

comments: 3 » tags: , , , ,

Gerber Bad For Baby Brains?

Posted on 23rd May 2011 in Uncategorized

Everyone knows that Gerber makes baby food.  And you might think that the baby food that Gerber recommends would be optimal for the growth and development of a baby.  According to some experts in the field of child nutrition, that may not be true.

Gerber has dietary recommendations on its website ( www.Gerber.com ).  There are several categories of childhood development on the site.  I randomly chose the category “Crawler”.  This seems to be kids who are about 9 months of age.  In my research, every recommendation that I found said that 50% of a baby’s calories should come from fat until at least the age of 2 years, which I discussed in my last post ( How Much Fat Does Your Baby Need to Eat? ).

I went to Gerber’s Crawler Nutrition Guide page, and I looked at the nutrition in what Gerber considers to be a good day’s worth of food for a Crawler.  I chose Gerber products from the list in the amounts that Gerber recommends for Crawler age kids.  I did not cherry pick, I actually chose randomly.  Here is what I chose from Gerber’s recommended list:

  • GERBER GOOD START Protect PLUS Formula – Powder – 5 servings (25 oz)
  • GERBER NatureSelect 2ND FOODS Vegetables – Peas – 1 serving
  • GERBER Organic SmartNourish 2ND FOODS Purees – Farmer’s Market Vegetable Blend with Mixed Grains – 3 servings
  • GERBER NatureSelect 2ND FOODS Fruits – Apple Strawberry Banana – 1 serving
  • GERBER Mixed Grain Cereal – 2 servings

Here is what I found – this day’s worth of food contains:
29 g of fat
133 g of carbs
19 g of protein

A gram of fat has 9 calories, a gram of carbohydrate has 4 calories, and a gram of protein has 4 calories.  That adds up to:
252 fat calories
532 carbohydrate calories
76 protein calories

And when I do the math I come up with:
29.3 % of calories from fat
61.9 % of calories from carbohydrates
8.8% of calories from protein.

To repeat a quote from one of my sources from last post:

Science Daily – Infants, Toddlers Should Not Restrict Fat Intake, Experts Say:

Watkins and Hennig, however, suggest that we should not restrict fat until 5 years of age, and then reduce it gradually throughout childhood and teen years. They say that limiting dietary fat to less than 30 percent of total calories in young children may reduce growth and lead to nutritional shortages.

So, according to these experts, the low fat levels in Gerber’s recommended meal “may reduce growth and lead to nutritional shortages”.

And for further emphasis, let me tell you what the American Academy of Pediatrics says about the importance of fat on their website www.HealthyChildren.org :
Low Fat Diets For Babies


Here’s a very important recommendation to keep in mind—do not restrict your child’s consumption of dietary fat and calories in the first 2 years of life. In other words, don’t put a baby younger than 2 years on a diet or give her low-fat or skim milk.
Here’s why: the early months and years of your child’s life are critical for the normal development of her brain and body. Specifically, she’ll need calories from dietary fat for her brain to grow and mature normally.
As a general rule, your child should get about half of her daily calories from fat up to the age of 2 years.

Please check my math here.  If I made a mistake in reading their recommendations or in my math, please tell me.  But it looks to me like Gerber’s recommended diet will not promote optimal brain growth or physical development.

 

comment on forum


How much fat does your baby need to eat?

Posted on 20th May 2011 in Uncategorized

 

How much fat do babies need in their diets?

For decades dietary fat has been enemy #1 to those interested in health.  It has been considered the cause of obesity, heart disease, cancer, and many other health problems.  But now it seems that much of this blame has been misplaced.  Many types of fat have a positive roll in health.  And nowhere is that more true than in childhood development.

Children grow.  That is what they do.  Their brains and bodies need large amounts of fat in order to develop to their full potential.  That is not to say that children should be fat, but that their diets should contain lots of fat.  Here are three sources which all agree that young children should get 50% of their calories from fat!

Ask Dr. Sears
http://www.askdrsears.com/html/4/t041300.asp
Smart fats for growing brains
Fats can also influence brain development and performance, especially at either end of life — growing infants and elderly people. In fact, there are two windows of time in which the brain is especially sensitive to nutrition: the first two years of life for a growing baby and the last couple decades of life for a senior citizen. Both growing and aging brains need nutritious fats.

The most rapid brain growth occurs during the first year of life, with the infant’s brain tripling in size by the first birthday. During this stage of rapid central nervous system growth, the brain uses sixty percent of the total energy consumed by the infant. Fats are a major component of the brain cell membrane and the myelin sheath around each nerve. So, it makes sense that getting enough fat, and the right kinds of fat, can greatly affect brain development and performance. In fact, during the first year, around fifty percent of an infant’s daily calories come from fat. Mother Nature knows how important fat is for babies; fifty percent of the calories in mother’s milk is fat.

HealthyChildren.org
http://www.healthychildren.org/English/ages-stages/baby/feeding-nutrition/pages/Low-Fat-Diets-For-Babies.aspx
As a general rule, your child should get about half of her daily calories from fat up to the age of 2 years.

Science Daily
Infants, Toddlers Should Not Restrict Fat Intake, Experts Say
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1998/02/980204072045.htm
Watkins and Hennig, however, suggest that we should not restrict fat until 5 years of age, and then reduce it gradually throughout childhood and teen years. They say that limiting dietary fat to less than 30 percent of total calories in young children may reduce growth and lead to nutritional shortages.

How much fat does your baby get?  Now that we have established the amount of fat your baby needs, we will look at how much fat Gerber wants your baby to eat.

 

comments


comments: 1 » tags: , , , ,